Wednesday, February 10, 2010

66 book of the bible were written by different writers from different orgins true of false?

After I had shared the above facts with this student, I offered him the following challenge: I said to him, “If you do not believe that the Bible is the inspired word of God, if you do not believe that the Bible is of a supernatural origin, than I challenge you to a test.” I said to the student, “I challenge you to go to any library in the world, you can choose any library you like, and find 66 books which match the characteristics of the 66 books in the Bible. You must choose 66 books, written by 40 different authors, over 1500 years, in 3 different languages, written on 3 different continents. However, they must share a common storyline, a common theme, and a common message, with no historical errors or contradictions.” I went on to say, “If you can produce such a collection of books, I will admit that the Bible is not the inspired word of God.” The student’s reply was almost instantaneous, he emphatically stated, “But that’s impossible66 book of the bible were written by different writers from different orgins true of false?
The only thing in common between these 66 books is that they share the same true God.





The other point about these authors, - is they didn't get paid any royalties. A lot of them were killed for their 'works' of non-fiction.66 book of the bible were written by different writers from different orgins true of false?
Those people not only had translators, but likely all the other copies of the book that had been written before then as well ^_^. They could check it. It took 1500 years, didn't it? Plenty of time to acquire all the other books that had been written up till then.





And at any rate, there are many mistakes in it.
Incorrect.


1. There are '73 books', not 66.


2. Books like Samuel, Kings and Chronicles were 'split' into 2 apiece.


3. If memory serves me correctlyEzra and Nehemiah can be seen as 1 book also in some text.


4. Just because there are 73 books (kinda) does not mean there are 73 authors). Paul wrote several books, 5 books ascribed to Moses (and some parties 6 (the Book of Job)).
Stanley, all the information in the quote is true, it happened. All the information given, the 66 books and such are easily verifiable. It is true
Bohahahhahhahahahahahahhhhahahhahaaahaha… . LOL Hhahahahhahahahhahahah hh ... Stop stop , hahahhaha I am gonna peeee. !Hahahahh hahahhahahaahhhaaaaa
Maybe you should read those 66 books a little closer and then you will be able to see how they contradict each other.


On a by point,how do you know there were 40 different authors when nobody knows who wrote those stories.
''no historical errors or contradictions''





such is the power of delusion to cloud the mind
True, but you aren't going to convince any atheists, they're not into acknowledging facts when it comes to opposition.
Temporal lobe issues again.
That's right , it is impossible to find of the same. I believe he's a christian now. He have too because he lost ( or was it a she).
So you know nothing about Constantine and the Council of Nicaea and you believe the Bible dropped out of the sky bound in black leather?





man are you naive.
True,and I like the question you presented him with.
yeah very good points you made there really good actually :)
sure


thats right


from the bible words


no book in the world is copied with same contence
Well done!








God bless you.


† ♥
i am very proud of you good job
It is not 100% so. The first five books of the Bible were all written by Moses. And there are other books in the Bible that had the same writer, like Luke and Acts were the same and the John's were the same, I Peter %26amp; II Peter,...


So he would not have quite so vast a task; but probably impossible all the same.


Are you aware that the Science of Earth Development was made up in an atheists imagination about 100 years ago and modern scientist have been trying to get science to match the date he made up? Fossils have even been found with mans and dinosaurs foot prints in them; but science dose not want to admit to it.

No comments:

Post a Comment